

Dan the Damned wrote:I'm sure we're to blame somehow...

SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:Ok guys....let me tell you how close we are to being done! Your director hasn't had a real vacation in years. Today, I finished my passport renewal and I am looking at airfare to Australia! As soon as we wrap P3, I am on vacation! Motivation to get this baby wrapped!
astonio wrote:What's with the game show host persona?
On April 14, 2012...Ryan Katzenbach wrote:Okay guys....there is a second set of DeFeo crime scene photos. True or false?
On October 7, 2011...Ryan Katzenbach wrote:There was a second, unofficial set of crime scene photos taken that night that have some very interesting angles of the house and capture pictures of police personnel processing the scene.

sherbetbizarre wrote:SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:Today, I finished my passport renewal and I am looking at airfare to Australia!
Lyin' Ryan just wrote:At long last, we have a functioning, full rough cut of Part II. Very, very pleased....2:57 run time, which is much longer than I anticipated, but the pacing is intense. Over the next weeks, we'll be finalizing....but suffice to say, you're going to be seeing this in under 60 days!
Brendan72 wrote:sherbetbizarre wrote:SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:Today, I finished my passport renewal and I am looking at airfare to Australia!
Just what this country needs ...

Dan the Damned wrote:Lyin' Ryan just wrote:At long last, we have a functioning, full rough cut of Part II. Very, very pleased....2:57 run time, which is much longer than I anticipated, but the pacing is intense. Over the next weeks, we'll be finalizing....but suffice to say, you're going to be seeing this in under 60 days!
No we won't. There's no way he will get this out in 60 days. That's June 15th. Nope. Won't happen. Just like how he promised back in December that Part Three would be released today. He continues to give himself deadlines that he just can't keep. After years of doing this, you'd think he'd have a more realistic timetable...
sherbetbizarre wrote:Dan the Damned wrote:Lyin' Ryan just wrote:At long last, we have a functioning, full rough cut of Part II. Very, very pleased....2:57 run time, which is much longer than I anticipated, but the pacing is intense. Over the next weeks, we'll be finalizing....but suffice to say, you're going to be seeing this in under 60 days!
No we won't. There's no way he will get this out in 60 days. That's June 15th. Nope. Won't happen. Just like how he promised back in December that Part Three would be released today. He continues to give himself deadlines that he just can't keep. After years of doing this, you'd think he'd have a more realistic timetable...
I don't think I've ever seen a show or movie where the pacing is "intense" for three solid hours...
This will either be epic or give people huge headaches.
Over the next two weeks, we're paying a visit to the "cutting room." For two solid weeks, we'll review the film over and over, and slice and dice the unnecessary fat.
Dan the Damned wrote:On the interview you just linked to Ryan promises Part II will come 60 days after Part I, and then Part III will come 60 days after Part II. So I guess we're looking at this timeframe now:
Part I - Dec 16, 2011
Part II - Feb 16, 2012
Part III - April 16, 2012
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:Ripping through Part II. Expect to hear about a release date by mid-May, but suffice to say....it won't be long now!
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:Okay, friends and fans....got a solid cut of P2 standing at 2:48 in runtime. I want to hear your feedback....too long? Or, do you think running time matters if the story is there? After hearing your replies, I will share my feelings from the filmmakers POV.....so.......tell me what you think!
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:This is exactly the feedback I want to hear....what YOU, as students and enthusiasts of thid case want to hear! Now....here is a specific question....I am going to let you make the decision....
Right now....as we speak....I am at a point in the film where Peggy Giambra is describing each member of the jury. I love the detail, but it feels like it interrupts pacing. Is this important to you, to hear about the makeup of the jury? I am going to leave this decision on your hands! You....the fans....get to make the call! Cut it...keep it? You tell me!



Dan the Damned wrote:Ryan, here's some advice for you. When you get to material that makes you wonder "should I cut this" then the answer should be a resounding YES. It should be cut. Cut and either left on the cutting room floor or included as a DVD bonus feature (not part of the main film). If you still are running long, then check your ego and lose all the BS with you and Ric playing detective and just concentrate on the case. We don't need to see a gripping recreation of how Ric met Geraldine (unless you plan on making the case that Geraldine is real -- at which point you'll need to turn this into a 4-part trilogy).
You're welcome.
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:Well, guys, 28 comments or so later, you made the decision. It stays. And no more will I worry about runtime, and instead, will focus on pacing. Only the clips that offend pace will be removed and relegated to Bonus Feature status. Peg's info is good, and succinct, as it pertains to the jury, and it paints the never before seen debate and fight that took place during deliberation. To compare Peg's minute or two analysis of the jury to Judge Stark's 12 minute jury instructions, I think we can all agree that Judge Stark's instructions are a bonus feature and not part and parcel of the film itself. You guys have been a tremendous help, and, frankly, it's a hell of a lot of fun to include you all in this process. A bit unconventional to ask editing advice, but, hell, what about this film, so far (a 7-hour documentary in total) has been conventional. We are making this film for you, so your contribution to us counts!
I have obsessed over how much face time I have in Part II.....I hate being in my own film with a passion. But, as you will see in P2, there is a great deal of explanation that takes place as to the materials we found. I am feeling more secure now that you will come along for the journey to our conclusions, and that feels great as a filmmaker! Stand by guys....P2 is going to really take you for one hell of a ride into aspects of this case you never knew!
A friend of mine says yesterday, when we were discussing Part II: "...the brave, bold filmmaker is second guessing his runtime? Give me a break. You know what you are doing, so do it. If you didn't CBS News wouldn't have invested their airtime....Maxim wouldn't have sent you out to 2 million people, and the :) love :) AG's office would have dismissed you. But, they, and 3,000 fans on Facebook have followed what you're doing. And what you do defies convention, so screw making your story fit in some tidy runtime. Deliver it. Build it, and they will come.". Now, how can I argue with that?
A bit unconventional to ask editing advice, but, hell, what about this film, so far (a 7-hour documentary in total) has been conventional.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest