DC Fan wrote:Victoria Principles wrote:DC Fan,
Not sure what you are getting at. What is the big deal about this photo?
Victoria:
You have yourself expressed the theory that the photo is edited, even if you don't like the word "fake". So I suspect what we really disagree on is the usage of it. I think a documentary filmmaker should not use it and still expect me to grant him the same credibility as I might grant his guest or another filmmaker who only shows unedited photos. If the real thing just does not exist they are not required to create it. They can go ahead with just a regular school photo or nothing. If you want to disagree with that it's your choice.
The People article mentions that the adoption occured and scrunches it in with events in New York. It does not say exactly that the adoption occured in New York but I agree it can be interpreted that way. In the other article it is George himself saying the adoption occured in California. This is an example of how I use the concept of credibility. George would have known and had no reason to lie about this. To effect this adoption in California, he could have simply paid Mr. Quaratino's expenses in submitting a sworn affidavit through a notary public. Thus these articles do not alter my opinion one iota that if that certificate is of adoption it should be from California.
Victoria Principles wrote:DC Fan wrote:Victoria Principles wrote:DC Fan,
Not sure what you are getting at. What is the big deal about this photo?
Victoria:
You have yourself expressed the theory that the photo is edited, even if you don't like the word "fake". So I suspect what we really disagree on is the usage of it. I think a documentary filmmaker should not use it and still expect me to grant him the same credibility as I might grant his guest or another filmmaker who only shows unedited photos. If the real thing just does not exist they are not required to create it. They can go ahead with just a regular school photo or nothing. If you want to disagree with that it's your choice.
The People article mentions that the adoption occured and scrunches it in with events in New York. It does not say exactly that the adoption occured in New York but I agree it can be interpreted that way. In the other article it is George himself saying the adoption occured in California. This is an example of how I use the concept of credibility. George would have known and had no reason to lie about this. To effect this adoption in California, he could have simply paid Mr. Quaratino's expenses in submitting a sworn affidavit through a notary public. Thus these articles do not alter my opinion one iota that if that certificate is of adoption it should be from California.
DC Fan,
Is the photo of Danny fake? (Is it another kid)? Is the photo of the house fake (Is it a different house)? Have you ever thought that this is a photo of Danny against a background photo of the house?
As far as the aboption laws go, here is summary of New York state laws, including a section on step parent adoption.
http://www.nysccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/adoptionbasics.pdf
When adopted, the adopted kids get a new birth certificate with the step parent and natural parents name on them. Since the Quarantino kids father still lived in New York state and the father had to OK the adoption, there is probably certificate of adoption in both New York and California.
Jacobmarley1 wrote:Regardless of what they say, will you believe them simply because they're the children of George and Kathy Lutz?
Victoria Principles wrote:They are children of Kathy Lutz, not George Lutz.
I believe a lot of what they said. Since they were young, especially Chris, their perspective back then could be clouded. But what they said fills in a lot of blanks. Like why the forces followed them and did not stay in the house. Many people who move from alleged haunted houses don't have the forces follow them. The force at Amityville seem to be attached to the Lutzes, not the house. This often happens when people fool around with the occult without the proper precautions.
I also thought there was something George and Kathy were hiding. It wasn't that they were in on a hoax, but got into something more deeply then what they really intended on.
AllisonFlorida wrote:Victoria Principles wrote:They are children of Kathy Lutz, not George Lutz.
I believe a lot of what they said. Since they were young, especially Chris, their perspective back then could be clouded. But what they said fills in a lot of blanks. Like why the forces followed them and did not stay in the house. Many people who move from alleged haunted houses don't have the forces follow them. The force at Amityville seem to be attached to the Lutzes, not the house. This often happens when people fool around with the occult without the proper precautions.
I also thought there was something George and Kathy were hiding. It wasn't that they were in on a hoax, but got into something more deeply then what they really intended on.
Or they had to say it because they knew what would happen to them if they did not do as they were told. Allison
optitom wrote:Hi. I'm from Amityville and grew up on Hamilton Street around the corner from ocean avenue and the house. I was young, about 5 years old when the murders occurred and know bob kelskey personally. The only thing that happened which is true..I REPEAT!!!!!! The only true thing that happened there that was true was that Ron, or butch, killed his family. Thats all that happened...no ghosts, possessions, devil worships, Indian burial grounds or anything like that on or near the property...no witches, werewolves, bigfoots or aliens spoke through him either. He was a heroin addict who killed his family for the money for more drugs. Please just let it be. Amityville is a beautiful town that has been scarred and idiots keep coming into it to have seances, devil worships and all kinds of crazyflower
. People have actually ripped peices of the siding off the poor owners house and dig up the grass for souvegniers. Please let the owners live in peace. Its always been occupied and no other owners have fled in the night. The Lutzes couldnt pay the mortgage and left. The
silly dilly
saying they never returned to get their belongings is also
silly dilly
. I saw them return, being an 8 year old boy, return and collect their motorcycles and everything else into a uhaul.THE GHOSTS NEVER HAPPENED!!! There are no burial grounds, no witches or anything remotely close to that in Amityville. Please just let the residents be!!! I will gladly speak to people who are interested and want to know the truth..seeing as how i was there. Thanx
optitom wrote:Hi. I'm from Amityville and grew up on Hamilton Street around the corner from ocean avenue and the house. I was young, about 5 years old when the murders occurred and know bob kelskey personally.
Jacobmarley1 wrote:optitom wrote:Hi. I'm from Amityville and grew up on Hamilton Street around the corner from ocean avenue and the house. I was young, about 5 years old when the murders occurred and know bob kelskey personally.
How would a 5-year old personally know Bobby Kelske, who was about 20-years old? Were the Kelske's friends of the family, or something?
optitom wrote:No, i never met any of the lutzes, i was too young, and i knew kelske from when i was a bartender at jj's tavern, it used to be the witches brew and he would come in every once in awhile for a few beers. I did not know he even died, i havent been up for about 10 years, aside from a visite last year. You guys are more up on the town i grew up in....lol. I remember as a kid, me and a few buddies set up a lemonade stand across the street from the house, on ireland place and ocean ave. That was when the movie just came out and amityville was a mad house...lol. we were on the news cuz we made so much money..of course our parents kept it all, we didnt care ..we were kids..lol
Jacobmarley1 wrote:Optitom, I'm sure when the Amityville-thing became "big," you as a local resident must have taken pictures. Show us, please, in the Amityville Photographs section.
Jacobmarley1 wrote:Not for nothing, but I would have been more inclined to believe Danny and Chris if they had "come out" when they reached the "age of consent." I would have believed them then because they weren't old enough to be cynical and opportunistic.
Now, however, they're - how old? in their 40's? I'm sure that, by now, their "desire" to tell the truth is based on how much they can get paid. I don't blame them for jumping on the bandwagon (a little late, you ask me), but I'm not just going to sit there and believe everything they say.
optitom wrote:I posted pics in the photograph section from about a year ago. DOnt have any when the movie came out..i was too young.
Jacobmarley1 wrote:optitom wrote:I posted pics in the photograph section from about a year ago. DOnt have any when the movie came out..i was too young.
but what about your parents? They never took pictures? What about when you got older, before they changed the appearance of the house in the late 1980s - you never took pictures then, either?
Return to Amityville Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 3 guests